TechRam For IT Leaders
How do you build an org chart that stays up to date?
An org chart stays current only if it's generated from Entra ID rather than drawn. Entra already holds each person's manager, job title and department, and it's maintained because provisioning depends on it. A chart read from the directory updates when the directory does.
Why the chart is always wrong
The org chart on an intranet is almost always an image, a slide or a PDF. Somebody built it for an onboarding pack, it was accurate for about a fortnight, and updating it is nobody’s responsibility.
It then does active harm. A new starter uses it to work out who to ask, gets a name who left last year, and learns not to trust the intranet. That lesson generalises to every other page on it.
The directory already knows
Entra ID holds the answer and is maintained, because account provisioning depends on it. For each person it already has:
- Manager, which is the edge the chart is drawn from
- Job title and department
- Office location, and their photo
- Whether the account is still enabled, which is the part a drawn chart can never reflect
That last one matters most. A generated chart loses somebody the day their account is disabled. A drawn one keeps them until a human notices.
What has to be true for it to work
The manager field has to be populated. This is the real prerequisite and it’s usually where the project stalls. If HR maintains reporting lines in an HR platform and nobody syncs them to Entra, the directory has gaps — and a chart with gaps is worse than no chart, because the gaps look like fact.
Check before you build. Count the enabled accounts with no manager set. If it is more than a handful, fixing that is the project and the chart is the by-product.
Somebody has to own job titles. Entra titles drift, because nobody sees them. A generated chart makes them visible, which is a feature and also the first week’s worth of corrections.
Dotted lines won’t fit. Entra models one manager per person. Matrix reporting, secondments and acting arrangements don’t exist in the directory, so decide up front whether the chart is the formal structure or the working one. It can be the formal structure accurately, or the working structure approximately, and not both.
The sequence
- Audit the manager field. Fix the gaps at source, in whatever system owns reporting lines
- Agree who owns job titles and how a change gets made
- Generate the chart from Entra, on the intranet page people already open
- Delete the old image, so there’s no second answer
Step four sounds trivial and is the one that gets skipped. Two org charts is the same problem as none.
Where to start
The Org Chart Web Part draws a live chart from Entra ID on a SharePoint page. Ask for it on the page and we’ll send the package and the setup notes.
If the wider problem is that the intranet has several answers to most questions and no owner for any of them, the chart is a symptom. That’s the Intranet & Knowledge Layer.
The service behind this: Intranet & Knowledge Layer →
Common questions
01. Why is the org chart on the intranet always wrong?
It's an image, a slide or a PDF somebody drew for an onboarding pack. It was accurate for about a fortnight, and redrawing it is nobody's responsibility.
02. What has to be true before you generate one from the directory?
The manager field has to be populated, because that's the edge the chart is drawn from. Count the enabled accounts with no manager set; if it's more than a handful, fixing that at source is the project and the chart is the by-product.
03. Can a generated chart show dotted lines and matrix reporting?
No. Entra ID models one manager per person, so secondments and acting arrangements don't exist in the directory. A generated chart can be the formal structure accurately or the working structure approximately, and not both.
04. What does a generated chart do that a drawn one can't?
It loses somebody the day their account is disabled. A drawn chart keeps them until a human notices, which is why a new starter uses it and gets a name who left last year.